Thursday June 19th 2003 | Martingrove's Independent News Source
 

ECI increases physics marks:
MCI students outraged

Without the recommendation of a teacher, the administration at Etobicoke Collegiate Institute has increased the physics marks of OAC students.

As university admissions averages continue to rise, students are demanding increasingly higher marks - and school administrators are complying. With minimal justification, the marks submitted by the teacher are being raised by up to several percentage points.

During an interview, one ECI Vice-Principal declined to comment on why the marks were adjusted and what criteria were used. The Vice-Principal informed the MFP editors that the ECI administration was simply "trying to help students, so that no one was handicapped," and that the ECI administration was "working in the best interest of their students." The Vice-Principal refused to directly confirm that the marks had indeed been adjusted.

Mark manipulation is not unprecedented at Etobicoke C.I. According to Mr. Heathcote, the OAC physics teacher, the administration had adjusted his marks in previous years. Contrasting the view of the Ms. Hutzul, the administrator responsible, Mr. Heathcote stated that his marks are based on how well students understand physics according to the Ministry of Education curriculum. He continued, saying, "I stand by my marks. They are based on good evaluations."

When asked whether the students at other schools were being put at a disadvantage by the increased ECI marks, the Vice-Principal replied: "I'm sure they're not looking at whether they're handicapping us."

This mentality outraged certain Martingrove students, who expressed concern that this will only lead to a "vicious race to the bottom," in which marks continue to be inflated until they lose most of their value. "I find it difficult to believe that an individual as prominent as [the Vice-Principal] can think like that," said one OAC student.

Mr Rushby, Martingrove's Math Department Head, echoed these sentiments. "It's a huge mistake for [an administrator] to [raise the marks] without compelling evidence," he said.

The vice principal stated that all marks are reviewed by the administration and if there is a concern with the submitted marks, the teacher is consulted. The Vice-Principal claimed that the teachers are involved in the mark revision process, but Mr. Heathcote disagreed: "They asked me to raise them. I said, I think these reflect the work of the students."

The physics teacher also made it clear that only the administration has the authority to grant credits and that teachers can only recommend what mark a student deserves. He stressed that the administration doesn't need his permission to adjust the marks.

The Vice-Principal emphasized that the administration was not lying to the students nor helping them cheat. In raising the marks, they were simply looking out for the best interests of their students.

 
Subscribe!
MFP delivered to your e-mail inbox
 
 Issue Archive
 Poster campaign
 Photo Gallery
 MFP Wear

 About the MFP